Search
  • Stephen Biss

ABA Sequences v ACA Sequences


Purpose:

To explain to the Court, the differences between ABA (Esc Esc B) and ACA (Esc Esc C) sequences

To confirm that ABA sequences are not recorded in COBRA data but ACA sequences are recorded in COBRA data.

To explain to the Court why the calibration checks at 40 or 50, 100, and 300 during annual inspections do not appear in COBRA data disclosed.

Q. Just, before we go any further, there are two different kinds of sequences that can be used for using a wet bath simulator. One is the A-B-A sequence, one is the AC- A sequence. Could you explain for everybody’s benefit what the difference is between the two – those two kinds of sequences? A. So, the first is where you’re providing a sample of breath. So, you are using a simulator and you’re blowing through it, as if a person was providing a sample. And then it’s reading the concentration of alcohol in the sample chamber. And the – an – sorry, that’s an A-C-A. No, sorry, that’s an A-B-A, where you are the pump and you are providing the sample into the instrument. An A-C-A is where you’re using a calibration check. It’s a stand-alone

calibration check. So, you’re using a solution that’s placed in a simulator, and you’re recirculating that, and that’s what’s reading.

Q. And just also, for everybody else’s benefit, A-B-A results are recorded – are not recorded in Cobra Data. A-C-A are recorded in Cobra Data. A. That's correct. But of course then, I don’t know what also happened with respect to how many – did he allow the solution to warm up properly, which could also explain the low results at the 100 and the 50 or the 40. I mean, those are possible other explanations for why those are reading low.

#annualmaintenance #inspection #COBRA

0 views

© 2019 Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. All rights reserved. This is not a government web site.

 

 

For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., 303-470 Hensall Circle, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5A 3V4, 905-273-3322. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.  WARNING: All information contained herein is provided  for the purpose of discussion and peer review only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney. 

WARNING: Please do not attempt to use any text, image, or video that you see on this site in Court. These comments, images, and videos are NOT EVIDENCE. The Courts will need to hear evidence from a properly qualified expert. The author is not a scientist. The author is not an expert. These pages exist to promote discussion among defence lawyers.

 

Intoxilyzer®  is a registered trademark of CMI, Inc. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C is an "approved instrument" in Canada.
Breathalyzer® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc., Breathalyzer Division. The owner of the trademark is Robert F. Borkenstein and Draeger Safety, Inc. has leased the exclusive rights of use from him. The Breathalyzer® 900 and Breathalyzer® 900A were "approved instruments" in Canada.
DrugTest® 5000 is also a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc.. DrugTest® 5000 is "approved drug screening equipment" in Canada.
Alcotest® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc. The Alcotest® 7410 GLC and 6810 are each an "approved screening device" in Canada.
Datamaster®  is a registered trademark of National Patent Analytical Systems, Inc.  The BAC Datamaster® C  is an "approved instrument" in Canada.