Search
  • Stephen Biss

Establishment of Calibration Intervals


Purpose:

To introduce the concept of "calibration interval" in the international literature.

Q. A paper called Establishment and Adjustment of Calibration Intervals Revising N-C-S-L-I Recommended Practice, R-P-1. Do you have any idea what N-C-S-L-I is? A. No idea whatsoever.

Q. I think N-C-S-L-I.... A. This is the first time I’m seeing this. Q. Oh, is it? Okay. National Conference of Standards Laboratories, and with respect to recommended practice R-P-1. And it appears to be a paper with an author by the name of Mark Custer. The co-author is Doctor Howard Kestra (ph), Miguel Decos (ph) from NASA, Doctor Steve Dwyer, from N-S-W-C Corona and Doctor Dennis Jackson, N-S-W-C Corona. Do you know any of these people? A. I don’t know any of those individuals. This appears to be – this isn’t a peer reviewed article. It appears to be a presentation done at a workshop or a symposium. Q. All right. And.... A. That’s my – that’s what it initially appears to – unless there’s something....

Q. All right. So, just under the word “Introduction” on the first page there’s a suggestion there that “Whether or not it is explicitly recognised and controlled by the calibration laboratory or customer, every calibration is associated with a time period during which the calibration is considered valid and after which it is not.” Now is that consistent with your scientific experience? A. Yes. Q. And just read on, “More precisely the calibrated instrument’s measurement uncertainty increases with time after calibration in a process known as uncertainty growth and its measurement reliability or probably that it will be found in tolerance when calibrated decreases correspondingly.” Is that consistent with your experience? A. It’s a possibility, yes. Q. “And after a certain time period the calibration interval, the increased uncertainty and degraded measurement reliability drives the risk of measurement precision error beyond acceptable levels.” Is that your experience? A. That’s also a possibility, yes. MR. BISS: All right. If that item might be marked as an exhibit please, Your Honour? THE COURT: Exhibit 29 is – it’s looks like an article from 2007 N-C-S-L International Workshop and Symposium. EXHIBIT NUMBER 29: Article from 2007 N-C-S-L International Workshop and Symposium – produced and marked.


10 views

© 2020 Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. All rights reserved. This is not a government web site.

 

 

For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., 303-470 Hensall Circle, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5A 3V4, 905-273-3322. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.  WARNING: All information contained herein is provided  for the purpose of discussion and peer review only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney. 

WARNING: Please do not attempt to use any text, image, or video that you see on this site in Court. These comments, images, and videos are NOT EVIDENCE. The Courts will need to hear evidence from a properly qualified expert. The author is not a scientist. The author is not an expert. These pages exist to promote discussion among defence lawyers.

 

Intoxilyzer®  is a registered trademark of CMI, Inc. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C is an "approved instrument" in Canada.
Breathalyzer® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc., Breathalyzer Division. The owner of the trademark is Robert F. Borkenstein and Draeger Safety, Inc. has leased the exclusive rights of use from him. The Breathalyzer® 900 and Breathalyzer® 900A were "approved instruments" in Canada.
DrugTest® 5000 is also a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc.. DrugTest® 5000 is "approved drug screening equipment" in Canada.
Alcotest® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc. The Alcotest® 7410 GLC and 6810 are each an "approved screening device" in Canada.
Datamaster®  is a registered trademark of National Patent Analytical Systems, Inc.  The BAC Datamaster® C  is an "approved instrument" in Canada.