Search
  • Stephen Biss

Bandwidth of Filters Changes Over Time


Sample cross-examination of CFS scientist on aging filters at the end of the sample chamber resulting in changes in bandwidth and more polychromatic light so no good linearity.

Purpose: Consider the images below. How do we communicate these concepts to a Court? How do we expose over-simplification by Crown experts?

The pencil is the sample in the sample chamber.

The paperclips are the instrument's electronic response to the transmittance of IR light through the sample chamber. An electrical signal is produced by the detector at the end of the sample chamber that has a relationship to transmittance.

The instrument has been calibrated at the factory such that the calibration curve recorded in the instrument's calibration software settings says 4 paperclips = 2 gms and 2 paperclips = 1 gm.In other words, 4 paperclips of electronic response in the detector is made to be equal to 1 gm in indication. That making of a relationship is the calibration of the instrument at the factory during a manual tweaking (5000C) or an auto calibration sequence (8000C or 5000EN).

The circuit that does that is called the linearizer.

That relationship established with a screwdriver on a 5000C or a software adjustment on the 8000C does not change until the next re-calibration at the factory or the Canadian authorized Service Centre.

But what if the electronic response changes "over time" because the filter changes colour or gets dirty? Perhaps the bandwidth changes. Perhaps the properties of the filter and the optical system change "over time". What happens if the IR light bulb dims?

The calibration curve becomes wrong. It needs changing. The instrument needs re-calibration. The adjustment require may be non-linear - it may be a different amount at each of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mg/100mls. The new calibration curve relative to the old calibration curve may be a movement up, down, left, right, a stretch, or a rotation on any axis.

Q. But my suggestion to you is that it's not safe

for scientists from the Centre of Forensic Sciences to be

saying that every test stands on its own, without paying

close attention to the issues of linearity that

Mr. Kupferschmidt was talking about, because there is the

problem that as filters age, they may change over time, the

bandwidths may change. And if the Centre of Forensic

Sciences doesn't have any information about the bandwidth of

the filters, then it's not safe to assume that linearity is

going to be maintained over time.

A. The linearity of the instrument isn't going to

change. I don't know if I covered it the last time. It's

the response of that instrument that's going to change over

time, yes, because of changes over time with respect to the

light source or the filters themselves, correct. But, again,

the diagnostic checks and the calibration check that's

performed at the time of the test will let you know if

there's anything grossly wrong with the instrument that

requires it to go for service and possibly require either a

new light source and/or new filters for the detectors.

Q. All right. Just to break that down, that

answer. I agree with you with respect to linearity between

the instrument response and the indication on the instrument,

assuming that the calibration curve is fixed, it hasn't

changed, because there's been no re-calibration. But --

A. So, wait, we're talking about the subject test

in relation to the calibration check response?

Q. I'm talking about, I'm talking about over time

there is always an issue of linearity of the concentration in

the sample chamber, compared to the indication, as the

bandwidth of that filter changes over time.

A. There could be, yes.

Q. Right. Especially when the Centre of Forensic

Sciences doesn't know the bandwidth of the filter. Is it

big? Is it small? We don't know that, right?

A. Correct. There's some information. I don't

know where that information came from. I don't have it at my

fingertips. I seem to recall that, again, there was

information about what the bandwidth was. Can that change?

Can the -- like a pair of sunglasses or anything that's

exposed to light for long, long periods of time, could

response to that change? Yes, absolutely.

Application to Datamaster:

The following is an example showing a filter region of the IR spectrum used by Datamaster. Notice the shape of the peaks/valleys and the large bandwidth. And what if the bandwidth changes over time?

#crossex #bandwidth #filter

7 views

© 2020 Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. All rights reserved. This is not a government web site.

 

 

For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., 303-470 Hensall Circle, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5A 3V4, 905-273-3322. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.  WARNING: All information contained herein is provided  for the purpose of discussion and peer review only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney. 

WARNING: Please do not attempt to use any text, image, or video that you see on this site in Court. These comments, images, and videos are NOT EVIDENCE. The Courts will need to hear evidence from a properly qualified expert. The author is not a scientist. The author is not an expert. These pages exist to promote discussion among defence lawyers.

 

Intoxilyzer®  is a registered trademark of CMI, Inc. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C is an "approved instrument" in Canada.
Breathalyzer® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc., Breathalyzer Division. The owner of the trademark is Robert F. Borkenstein and Draeger Safety, Inc. has leased the exclusive rights of use from him. The Breathalyzer® 900 and Breathalyzer® 900A were "approved instruments" in Canada.
DrugTest® 5000 is also a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc.. DrugTest® 5000 is "approved drug screening equipment" in Canada.
Alcotest® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc. The Alcotest® 7410 GLC and 6810 are each an "approved screening device" in Canada.
Datamaster®  is a registered trademark of National Patent Analytical Systems, Inc.  The BAC Datamaster® C  is an "approved instrument" in Canada.