• Stephen Biss

Reliability: Ambient Interferents

Tip 48: The reliability of the alcohol standard in a wet-bath #duisimulator may be compromised by the presence in the breath room air of an interferent, that the approved instrument confuses with ethyl alcohol. In the same way that ambient ethyl alcohol can raise the zero baseline, so can an ambient interferent. Interferents may include paint, cleaning fluids, fingerprint cleanup fluids, and chemicals on the clothing or breath of the accused or the qualified technician.

Greater research needs to be done on the subject by scientists at the Centre of Forensic Sciences, by the Alcohol Test Committee, and by scientists in private practice. Further inquiries need to be made of the manufacturer as to the exact bandwidth of the IR filters on the 8000C.

This video is NOT expert evidence. It is provided as an aid to defence counsel in understanding the problem of chemical "interferents" in evidentiary breath testing generally, and wet-bath #duisimulator cal checks specifically. We need to discuss these issues and obtain better answers from the scientific community.

The following data was used during argument in R v O and was filed as part of Exhibits 2 and 9 on the Application. The data was originally filed in R v H at Brampton. The data reveal that the instrument, 80-003779 at Mississauga, flagged an "interferent detect" message during stand-alone calibration checks. Unless the alcohol standard from the lab or the #duisimulator cleaned/rinsed/lubricated by a QT was the source of the interferent, the cause of this fail must have been the ambient air in the breath room.

Breath rooms frequently contain cleaning equipment associated with fingerprinting. The following is an image captured in a Cambridge breath room by the professional photographer hired by the defence in R v G. Notice the reference to D-Limonene under First Aid Treatment.

#interferent #ambientfail #reliability #tip

8 views0 comments

© 2020 Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. All rights reserved. This is not a government web site.



For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., 303-470 Hensall Circle, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5A 3V4, 905-273-3322. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.  WARNING: All information contained herein is provided  for the purpose of discussion and peer review only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney. 

WARNING: Please do not attempt to use any text, image, or video that you see on this site in Court. These comments, images, and videos are NOT EVIDENCE. The Courts will need to hear evidence from a properly qualified expert. The author is not a scientist. The author is not an expert. These pages exist to promote discussion among defence lawyers.


Intoxilyzer®  is a registered trademark of CMI, Inc. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C is an "approved instrument" in Canada.
Breathalyzer® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc., Breathalyzer Division. The owner of the trademark is Robert F. Borkenstein and Draeger Safety, Inc. has leased the exclusive rights of use from him. The Breathalyzer® 900 and Breathalyzer® 900A were "approved instruments" in Canada.
DrugTest® 5000 is also a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc.. DrugTest® 5000 is "approved drug screening equipment" in Canada.
Alcotest® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc. The Alcotest® 7410 GLC and 6810 are each an "approved screening device" in Canada.
Datamaster®  is a registered trademark of National Patent Analytical Systems, Inc.  The BAC Datamaster® C  is an "approved instrument" in Canada.