• Stephen Biss

Digital v. Mercury

Tip 11: Which do you trust? -#duiSimulator thermometers digital v mercury ?

Why do we have a propensity to assume that a digital display is more accurate, precise, and reliable than an old-fashioned mercury thermometer? Mercury thermometers are NIST traceable but may suffer defects if the mercury separates. Digital display simulators come with a certificate from Guth that limits their reliability to defined standards to one year, subject to proper re-calibration annually. Defined Service (including re-calibration) Intervals are essential to reliability. The digital display on a Guth 2100 reads to 1/10 degree C. The printout of temperature on an Intoxilyzer 8000C Test Record reads to 1/100 degree C. Why should we trust either one of them? They are measurements and every measurement has uncertainty related to the measurement. If the police can't produce evidence of the reliability of their measurements of temperature, through proper calculation of the measurement uncertainty, and proof of traceability of the temperature measuring devices, then the measurement is useless. If police can't articulate the protocol they followed in measuring temperature, the measurement is useless. See Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States at pp. 113, 116, 117

#digital #tip

3 views0 comments

© 2020 Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. All rights reserved. This is not a government web site.



For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., 303-470 Hensall Circle, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5A 3V4, 905-273-3322. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.  WARNING: All information contained herein is provided  for the purpose of discussion and peer review only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney. 

WARNING: Please do not attempt to use any text, image, or video that you see on this site in Court. These comments, images, and videos are NOT EVIDENCE. The Courts will need to hear evidence from a properly qualified expert. The author is not a scientist. The author is not an expert. These pages exist to promote discussion among defence lawyers.


Intoxilyzer®  is a registered trademark of CMI, Inc. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C is an "approved instrument" in Canada.
Breathalyzer® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc., Breathalyzer Division. The owner of the trademark is Robert F. Borkenstein and Draeger Safety, Inc. has leased the exclusive rights of use from him. The Breathalyzer® 900 and Breathalyzer® 900A were "approved instruments" in Canada.
DrugTest® 5000 is also a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc.. DrugTest® 5000 is "approved drug screening equipment" in Canada.
Alcotest® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc. The Alcotest® 7410 GLC and 6810 are each an "approved screening device" in Canada.
Datamaster®  is a registered trademark of National Patent Analytical Systems, Inc.  The BAC Datamaster® C  is an "approved instrument" in Canada.