Search
  • Stephen Biss

Should DUI clients be encouraged to make wills?


Do criminal law lawyers who deal with clients who engage in very risky lifestyles have a professional obligation to recommend that they execute a will?

Dangerous driving, impaired driving, possession of explosives, and unsafe weapons storage are all criminal offences where the client is probably engaging in high risk activity. If the behaviour continues, death may be likely in a few years leaving spouse and family in a most unfortunate state of affairs. Perhaps lawyers who practise criminal law need to be more aware of the need to recommend wills, continuing powers of attorney for property, and powers of attorney for personal care.

Death isn't the only outcome for risky behaviour. Loss of mobility and livelihood due to severe injuries that happen during risky behaviour are also possible. I recall one client, a number of years ago, who suffered serious brain injury as a result of launching his vehicle "as high as the hydro wires" from a streetcar concrete barrier and then crashing the vehicle to the ground in flames. Hospital and toxicology documents showed a BAC at above 400 mg / 100 mls at the time of the crash.

These people needs wills and powers of attorney. We should offer to prepare such documents or make the appropriate referral.

Here is a web site that discusses the usual paragraphs in wills and explains the differences between a power of attorney for property and a power of attorney for personal care.

http://www.wills-estates.com


0 views

© 2019 Allbiss Lawdata Ltd. All rights reserved. This is not a government web site.

 

 

For more information respecting this database or to report misuse contact: Allbiss Lawdata Ltd., 303-470 Hensall Circle, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5A 3V4, 905-273-3322. The author and the participants make no representation or warranty  whatsoever as to the authenticity and reliability of the information contained herein.  WARNING: All information contained herein is provided  for the purpose of discussion and peer review only and should not be construed as formal legal advice. The authors disclaim any and all liability resulting from reliance upon such information. You are strongly encouraged to seek professional legal advice before relying upon any of the information contained herein. Legal advice should be sought directly from a properly retained lawyer or attorney. 

WARNING: Please do not attempt to use any text, image, or video that you see on this site in Court. These comments, images, and videos are NOT EVIDENCE. The Courts will need to hear evidence from a properly qualified expert. The author is not a scientist. The author is not an expert. These pages exist to promote discussion among defence lawyers.

 

Intoxilyzer®  is a registered trademark of CMI, Inc. The Intoxilyzer® 5000C is an "approved instrument" in Canada.
Breathalyzer® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc., Breathalyzer Division. The owner of the trademark is Robert F. Borkenstein and Draeger Safety, Inc. has leased the exclusive rights of use from him. The Breathalyzer® 900 and Breathalyzer® 900A were "approved instruments" in Canada.
DrugTest® 5000 is also a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc.. DrugTest® 5000 is "approved drug screening equipment" in Canada.
Alcotest® is a registered trademark of Draeger Safety, Inc. The Alcotest® 7410 GLC and 6810 are each an "approved screening device" in Canada.
Datamaster®  is a registered trademark of National Patent Analytical Systems, Inc.  The BAC Datamaster® C  is an "approved instrument" in Canada.